CASE RESULTS

In this highly contested commercial vehicle versus motorcycle case, the defense denied responsibility for a crash that left our client with facial fractures and a traumatic brain injury. After trial, the matter was resolved for $15,000,000.

In this auto versus motorcycle collision, police initially blamed our client for making a left turn, but thorough discovery and critical depositions uncovered evidence that others contributed to the crash. That work led to a $12,500,000 settlement for our client, who sustained a life-altering below-the-knee amputation.

Despite disputed liability in this auto versus bicycle accident, we secured a $10,250,000 result for a cyclist who suffered facial fractures and a mild traumatic brain injury.

Auto vs Pedestrian

The defense contested liability from the start and pointed to our client’s pre-existing spinal injuries as a reason to minimize the claim. We took the case all the way to trial and recovered $3,600,000 for our client.

Low-speed impact and disputed liability gave the defense every reason to undervalue this claim, but the injuries told a different story. We secured $2,350,000 for our client, who required back surgery following the collision.

The defense argued that a low-speed collision between two passenger vehicles could not have caused the injuries our client suffered, but we proved otherwise. Our client, who ultimately required a permanent spinal cord stimulator, received a $2,250,000 settlement.

A rear-end collision with a truck left our client with neck injuries serious enough to require surgery. We secured $2,100,000 to support their recovery.

Auto v. Auto

Even when fault pointed toward our client, we pursued justice for their family. In this commercial vehicle accident resulting in wrongful death, we secured a $2,000,000 recovery.

The defense argued the hazard was open and obvious, but our client’s injuries from a slip and fall at a swap meet were severe enough to require neck surgery. We secured $1,500,000 on their behalf.

A collision with a commercial vehicle left our client requiring hip surgery. We secured $1,350,000 to help them move forward.

Our client was a passenger with no fault in this collision, yet recovering fair compensation still required skilled advocacy. We secured $1,250,000 for injuries that required back surgery.

With surgery recommended but not yet performed, we did not wait for a procedure to validate our client’s injuries. We secured $1,250,000 based on the medical evidence available.

In this motorcycle versus auto collision, our client sustained a traumatic brain injury but did not require surgery. We secured $1,250,000, ensuring the full weight of their injury was recognized in the outcome.

A truck collision left our client with injuries severe enough to require a permanent spinal cord stimulator. We secured $1,175,000 to help them move forward.

When a commercial van struck our client, the resulting injuries required neck surgery. We secured $1,050,000 for our client despite the challenges of the case.

Pre-existing back injuries gave the defense a foothold to dispute the impact of this rear-end crash, but those injuries ultimately required surgery. We recovered $1,000,000 for our client.

Auto v. Truck

Passenger v. Bus

Auto v. Uber

A rear-end collision with a commercial truck caused back injuries that required surgery. We recovered $1,000,000 for our client.

Delayed treatment and the complexities of an uninsured motorist claim presented significant hurdles in this rideshare accident. We recovered $1,000,000 for our client, who ultimately required back surgery.

The opposing vehicle was a commercial truck, but our client’s injuries did not require surgery. We recovered $1,000,000 through persistent advocacy and a thorough presentation of the evidence.

Auto v. Truck

Auto v. Commercial Vehicle

A significant gap in treatment gave the defense reason to question the severity of our client’s injuries following this semi-truck collision. We pushed through those challenges and secured $950,000 for a client who ultimately required back surgery.

What appeared to be a low-impact collision with a commercial truck quickly became a high-stakes legal battle over liability and the severity of our client’s injuries. We fought through every challenge and secured a $9,000,000 result for our client, who required back surgery.

Auto v. Pedestrian

Disputed liability made this case between a cyclist and a motor vehicle an uphill battle. We secured $890,000 for our client, who sustained injuries requiring neck surgery.

In this rear-end collision between two passenger vehicles, our client sustained back injuries that required surgery. We recovered $860,000 on their behalf.

Auto v. Auto

Auto v. Truck

This sideswipe collision involved an uninsured motorist, adding complexity to an already challenging case. Our client sustained back injuries requiring surgery, and we recovered $840,000 on their behalf.

The defense argued the hazard was open and obvious, but our client’s injuries from this slip and fall were serious enough to require shoulder surgery. We secured $825,000 on their behalf.

Passenger v. Bus

Conflicting accounts of a stop sign dispute put liability at the center of this commercial truck accident. We cut through the disagreement and secured $725,000 for a client who required back surgery.

Our client sustained back injuries requiring surgery following a collision with a commercial vehicle. We recovered $700,000 to support their recovery.

Passenger v. Bus

Auto v. Commercial Vehicle

Auto v. Auto

Uninsured Motorist

Auto v. Truck

Auto v. Auto

Auto v. Truck

Auto v. Auto

Auto v. Auto

Auto v. Auto

Trip and Fall